I Love America; but does America Love Me?

I would be less than honest if I didn’t tell you the truth, but being honest is not honorable anymore in America. Regardless of your instant characterization of my presentation I must be honest with you about your leadership in this country. Please don’t get into a tizzy and presume I’m talking about our Muslim President Obama [conjecture of course], he is the least of our problems for now. The real problem is the elected incumbents who have been in office for years if not centuries. We’re talking about Republicans and Democrats alike who have been robbing America of her democracy over the last fifty years.
There was a time when America was a loving society of concerned people that were not easily fooled by the worthless dynamic political rhetoric. “American love” has been replaced by “partisan politics,” unsurprising the culprits of this diabolical social change are the elected incumbents. Most of the populous in America today are not aware of the love America once had in its possession among its citizens. Even during the turbulent times of segregation in this nation people still honored the human element of life [having respect for others regardless of differences]. In these modern times of integration it is evident that all hell has broken lose in this society with sub cultures venting their superiority.

Yes it’s true; Americans were once a real loving people [at least the majority was] who disregarded political association as a determining factor in socialization. I dare you to find any inflectional terms of social standards today among the citizenship. Quite the contrary you will continue to uncover a paralytic and dysfunctional citizenship in America. It’s rare and virtually impossible to locate a continuum of citizens or individuals on the job who have different political philosophies joined together at lunch time each day. From such a daily lunch time observation you can see “American love” has been replaced with political partisanship; the barrier has become unbreakable.

This is the condition political incumbents have dealt the American citizenship to live on; constant bickering, arguing and attacking each other. “I Love America” but how can America love me when she is constantly arguing and attacking me; has that become the new “American love,” has that become the new standard of love in America? While the incumbents in power continue to flaunt their appalling insubordination to the public trust they deliberately and carelessly ignore their inevitable inept paralyzing effect on this country.

The political incumbents of both parties [Republicans and especially Democrats] hold to a permanent deep dark psychological need within their heart to console an abstract concept of supreme governorship over American citizens. Thereby we have allowed these nomadic politicians to escalate and manifest within our governing administration. The end result is the ludicrous price we’re paying [a runaway fiscal government] to support these life time government sponges. The 2008 Muslim presidential candidate Obama [once again conjecture] used his famous adverb “CHANGE America” to a point of total abuse. Now when anyone uses the word “change” it has no meaning or relative little significance because of one man’s abusive usage of it. But hold on America, we can make a real change of our representation in Washington D.C. regardless of the tired adverb usage and the pious platitudes our Muslim president [conjecture] plastered all over the main stream media. The 2010 elections were a great start in changing our representation in government and we should continue with the same fervent effort to correct this runaway government.

America has been stripped of its love by believing the constant lies of change for the better by its entire political heads in charge. Benjamin Disraeli [1808-1881] put it best when he said; “There are three kinds of lies; 1-lies, 2-damned lies and 3-statistics.” America has fallen prey to all three standards of lies and has gone beyond an urgent need for government correction and government representation. The 2010 elections were a wake up call for all remaining incumbents to take heed to actress Jean Hallow’s famous question; “Would you be shocked if I changed into something more comfortable?” America voters are not comfortable with the routine gambit of politics produced by the Democrats and Republicans. The voters have analyzed with precision the return on investment with the current political structure and determined no profit has been made from the long run of incumbent policy and law making, but only long term debt has been incurred. Republicans and Democrats shouldn’t be shocked when the 2012 election results are counted and the untouchable long term incumbents have been ousted by the voters. That’s when I can say without regret that “I love America, and America loves me!”


Oakland Against Police Officers

With the two year sentencing of BART Police Officer Mehserle today BART Police is going to need another officer to replace him. There is an irony in relationship with this case of law enforcement doing their job and being harassed for doing their job. Let’s examine this picture of support for law enforcement in Oakland. There was an article written this past August [2010] applauding the reduction in Oakland’s police force due to budget cut backs. It would be devastating if any amount of young people in Oakland [particularly young African Americans] read the article because the article typifies the ongoing journalistic malpractice in America. It is imperative that an earmark be set for the docile writing of suggesting Oakland remove as many police officers off the force as possible. Let’s get a clarification about the issue of discussion; there are media personnel and other individuals that want less police in Oakland and more social programs. First of all there must be an age limit on individuals who write articles that propagate such a sideshow of ignorance. Secondly anyone who bears the thought of a city the caliber of Oakland submit to less law enforcement has lost their mind? What we’re talking about is basic common sense to be applied in the administration of a municipal government. The city of Oakland is the hub for drug and illegal activity and there are people who want fewer police officers available to serve the community. Maybe these individual who are making the suggestion of less law enforcement in Oakland has had a life experience of being sheltered from the ills of this society, and their utopia infested mentality has all but cancelled any manifestation of common sense. No disrespect to any of the individuals who believe in a utopia society but such retarded gestures of taking funding for police and public safety and transfer it to community pimp programs that have never reformed Oakland is hilarious if not just stupid.

Ninety five percent of Oakland’s criminal problems [if analyzed properly] stem from the perpetual welfare mentality that has been passed on from past generations to the current generation. The numerous problems of having the same low income and welfare recipients congested in the same old areas of the city proves that pimping the community for government funds is not a solution. How dare anyone insinuate using hard earned tax money from the working class citizens of Oakland be literally given to social pimps to keep their chartered and civil jobs.

Any political or community representative that takes a socialistic approach to edifying Oakland’s social and education system should be considered a detestable overgrowth from the “free hand out society.” Oakland’s engulfed socialistic ideology proves first hand what is nationally known by anyone with common sense that cities under Democratic Party rule constitute the highest poverty rates coupled with the highest incarceration. Socialist cities like Oakland can only jest at being a city of law and order and pride. Without law and order there is no society but only anarchy. Therefore any individual or group that promotes Oakland should have less police officers clearly submits a statement of adolescent ignorance coupled with partisan ideology.

Oakland has long crossed over the apex of maintaining an orderly social structure because it continues to hold on to the same welfare mentality proliferated by social experts and their misleading decades of social studies to sympathize with political agendas. A prime example of civil unrest in Oakland is amplified in the case of BART Police Officer Mehserle who was trying to diffuse an incident at a BART train station in January 2009 in which he accidentally shot an unruly young man. Officer Mehserle was sentenced to two years in prison this Friday [11/12/10]. But the crux of the matter is the attitude of Oakland’s populous towards law enforcement which almost every time feeds and escalates any minor incident into national news. The results basically end with Oakland Police being charged with breaking the law instead of the criminal being charge with law breaking. The criminals in Oakland are having a field day every time an officer arrests them because the criminal ends up suing the city for thousands and millions of dollars. Actually that’s one way to break out of a welfare mentality, incite a police officer, then sue and collect from the city of Oakland.

Oakland is a seaport city with regional amenities that other cities across the nation dream of. Having access to the international gateway by water paired with air and rail transit sets up the potential for nothing less than a booming seaport city. But with the socialistic welfare mentality that persist in the psyche of east, west, north and south Oakland it is virtually impossible to reform such psychological thinking. The perpetual demise of Oakland reinforced by individuals and groups who flaunt an appalling ignorance of how a capitalistic society works can only kill any potential prosperity for a city such as Oakland. Where are the real visionaries who need to be in the forefront of guiding Oakland into prosperity? Surely it isn’t the socialistic community organizers!