Can we build 

This sounds very good to me; as a matter of fact this sounds great to the majority of Americans, especially those in Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and California.  But don’t expect more than a hand full of Republicans and "zero" Democrats/Liberals to understand the logic and rationale for the need of the "GREAT WALL OF AMERICA."

What is the logic or reason for the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA?  It has been reported that the FBI was investigating a fatal shooting on the U.S. southern border. While there they were confronted by mexican soldiers with rifles loaded and aimed at the FBI investigators. Not only were the mexican soldiers aiming their loaded weapons at FBI agents but chased the FBI agents from the investigation site. Is there a more humiliating example of a wimpy national security policy that could have ever been conjured up; our law enforcement running from the enemy? Please read the incident report

As a seasoned military veteran myself, it is of pertinent action to return fire upon your enemy when fired upon. Although there were no guns fired by the mexican soldiers is a mute point because they drew their weapons and deliberately use them as a point of threat. At this point of weapon confrontation the FBI agents should have drawn weapons on the mexicans and fired at any unannounced flinch or movement by the mexicans. Forget about being political correct, this is about survival first, and safety second.

How did our law enforcement become so weak, wimpy?  The Mexican soldiers made the FBI back down and back off from their position. This within itself shows how cowardly our law enforcement has become when a third rate mexican police force tells a superior and lethal law enforcement agency [FBI] to go home. Of course the FBI was only acting in fear and frailty of the “mexican” soldiers, why?  Reason is because today's modern FBI has been trained to act as cowards in order to appease the enemy and not have a confrontation. Receiving orders from FBI superiors who receive their orders from the amateur president of the United States say a lot about America’s leadership and how dependable our national security is.

How can Americans avoid border confrontations with Mexico?  
In order to avoid any type of future confrontation with illegal mexicans who cross the border we must enact major implementations:
1. Place a full division of military personnel on the mexican border
2. Create a DMZ. Anyone found crossing in the DMZ area will be subjected to being shot and killed or captured; regardless if an American or mexican.
3. Stop wasting tax payers’ money on border fences.
4. Build a GREAT WALL OF AMERICA like China.
5. Time and realtionships with other countries have changed;America must take off its "kiddie gloves" and respond with authority.

Who will benefit from the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA?  Once the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA is built, all Americans will benefit from it. What’s more intriguing is that American unemployed skilled workers would become employed, as well as other American labor workers becoming employed. Anyone working on the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA will be thoroughly screened for citizenship. This will be the opportunity to show the ignorant politicians who claim that Americans will not work hard laboring jobs is a factual lie enfolded a hundred times over.

Shoud we be concerned about our realationship with Mexico?  Building the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA will not deteriorate the U.S. relationship with mexico.  Mexico has let it be known that they could care less about America when their soldiers aimed their loaded weapons directly at our FBI agents who were investigating a fatal shooting on the border. Building the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA will not offend mexico because the mexican people have a furious hate towards Americans in general because of the recent killings of mexicans on the border. Although the mexican peasants want revenge for their illegal mexican relatives death they completely forget that their illegal mexican brothers and cousins have killed innocent Americans in American border cities and all across America. So the answer to end all this momentum of confrontation and hate by the mexican peasants and mexican soldiers and mexican president, we must build the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA Now!

Will politicians support the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA?  It has been of great support that Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona has implemented illegal alien law SB1070 to curtail illegal mexicans coming into her state. It would be great if other political leaders would duplicate supporting the federal law of the land as Gov Brewer. If the governors of Texas and New Mexico would implement enforcing the illegal alien laws of the land there could be a change in the landscape of America. There would be more jobs for Americans and more security for the nation as well. What would be the best and most wonderful response to securing the United States southern border would be the building of the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA.

What leader will sacrifice their political career to sponsor the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA?  
The governors of Arizona, New Mexico, California and Texas should become strong advocates for the building of the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA because of the immediate trade offs that are offered to benefit their states:

1.immediate economic uplifting with real job creation [not temporary census jobs].
2.curtail border confrontation with illegal mexicans and international terrorist.
3.send a message to mexico that they need us more than we need them.

Have real Americans become passive and political correct?  The American Tax Payer should be screaming for the immediate building of the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA. Unemployed skilled Americans and American engineers can put their knowledge and skill together to build a bigger and better wall than China’s. America could build a real wall that the world has never envisioned, and it will be built by Americans and not mexicans. It is time for the political correctness of offending others in the world to come to an end, and America must begin to suffice for herself and end the sandbagging of other nations like mexico receiving benefits from America and pointing their weapons on our law enforcement agents.

Every American must support the “Great Wall of America!” If you don’t support the building of the GREAT WALL OF AMERICA then you should consider moving to the other side of the wall.

Thank you America for your support!
Dr BearClayborn
America's Political Psychiatrist

US vs THEM: States to Secede

CONSERVATIVE  States verses LIBERAL States

2016 was the turning point for America, but will America continue to turn from liberalism and its arrogant hate towards Christians, Conservatives and President Trump.  The cause and affect of wimpy sold out Republicans literally allowed conservatism to be eradicated from social consciousness and social recognition.  Let's review how the current condition of America came about.  The Conservative message was lost in the 2012 presidential elections, due to venomous distractions by the Democrat Party.  Gov Romney was more of a typical republican chump with money and couldn't campaign with a strike force of power against the sinister muslim Manchurian incumbent Barack Hussein.  Romney was trying to be respectful and nice to an obvious wicked socialist/communist liberal who's desire was to become America's first dictator.  Being nice doesn't win elections anymore in this country and Romney found out the hard way.  Barack Hussein proved his theory of wicked political tactics in application throughout his campaign by race baiting his constituents in order for his campaign to thrive.  The oval office muslim completed his mission of defending his oval office stay with enough political correct sheets and quilts to cover his malignant existence.   Excluding civil war cannons and bullets shredding the landscape of human life, the decline of race relations today has sunken below par of that historical time in America, all because Romney wouldn't fight for America, Capitalism, Conservatism or Christianity.

There was a truth that needed to be told during the 2012 elections concerning the polarizing beliefs and comprehension of basic life philosophy.  Political correctness diluted the boundaries of moral absolutes and basic foundations of truth in the United States of America.  The parameters of living in America have drastically changed in this country through mighty shifts of demography, coupled with a major shift from foundational morals and values to the new age uninhibited exercise of freedom and rights.  It is a firm truth that critical assessment has tabulated liberal constituents have reached 63% of the population as of 2016, and the moral shift will no longer be based in conservative values or Christian beliefs.  The days of having a constitutional and Christian foundation way of life in America officially ended on November 6, 2012.  All President Trump can do today is try to put some of the pieces of America back together again, and pray for a peaceful secession of states with hope that an inevitable bloody second civil war doesn't come about.

There is a constant petty mocking by liberals towards states deciding to secede from the union.  Whether liberals like it or not this legitimate decision making should be weighted.  The ignorance of liberals mocking seceding states is based on their interpretation that conservatives couldn't handle a black president, and to tell the truth they're correct.  Conservatives don't want a crayon color to be the bases of leadership, but the content of character.  The luminous ignorance of liberal values are far from reality of Americans wanting to live their life without being forced to know about who is homosexual.  The majority of Americans want to live by their own life philosophy and beliefs, and not by orders of liberal agenda or homosexual lifestyles slammed and forced into our social forums.  The conservative philosophy of life and the "Constitution of the United States of America" have been debased without remission of sin or offering of sensitivity by liberals.  Liberals want Americans to be sensitive to their immoral values and lifestyles, but yet liberals defy becoming sensitive to conservative or Christian values.  The polarized social and political situation in this country has reached its threshold of tolerance.  The message of tolerance was completely obliterated from the liberal run Democrat Party during the 2012 and 2016 elections.

Today we have concerned  Conservatives and Christians pleading for no further part of having daily hate and vindictive measures taken against them by liberals.  Today Christians and Conservatives have decided to offer a peaceful separation of state and life philosophies.  In order to justify conservative states forwarding their notice to secede from the intolerable liberal union, can be based on the commonly known world history of human division, or separate communities of life philosophies.  As such already permeates daily living in America through democracy, but liberalism has destroyed the fabric of democracy which allows various life philosophies to cohabitate within their respective boundaries.  Liberalism demands its religion of political correctness be the base of life philosophy in America.  Provided below is the analysis which examines the literal concept of liberal life philosophy against the literal concept of conservatism and Christianity.

Copyright 2005 (revised 2010) StudentNewsDaily.com

"We all want the same things in life. We want freedom; we want the chance for prosperity; we want as few people suffering as possible; we want healthy children; we want to have crime-free streets. The argument is how to achieve them…

Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems".

NOTE: The terms “left” and “right” define opposite ends of the political spectrum. In the United States, liberals are referred to as the left or left-wing and conservatives are referred to as the right or right-wing. On the U.S. political map, blue represents the Democratic Party (which generally upholds liberal principles) and red represents the Republican party (which generally upholds conservative principles).

THE ISSUES: (In alphabetical order)

Liberal Comprehension
A woman has the right to decide what happens with her body. A fetus is not a human life, so it does not have separate individual rights. The government should provide taxpayer funded abortions for women who cannot afford them. The decision to have an abortion is a personal choice of a woman regarding her own body and the government must protect this right. Women have the right to affordable, safe and legal abortions, including partial birth abortion.

Conservative Belief
Human life begins at conception. Abortion is the murder of a human being. An unborn baby, as a living human being, has separate rights from those of the mother. Oppose taxpayer-funded abortion. Taxpayer dollars should not be used for the government to provide abortions. Support legislation to prohibit partial birth abortions, called the "Partial Birth Abortion* Ban"(*Partial Birth Abortion: the killing of an unborn baby of at least 20 weeks by pulling it out of the birth canal with forceps, but leaving the head inside. An incision is made in the back of the baby's neck and the brain tissue is suctioned out. The head is then removed from the uterus.)

Affirmative Action  
Liberal Comprehension
Due to prevalent racism in the past, minorities were deprived of the same education and employment opportunities as whites. The government must work to make up for that. America is still a racist society, therefore a federal affirmative action law is necessary. Due to unequal opportunity, minorities still lag behind whites in all statistical measurements of success.

Conservative Belief
Individuals should be admitted to schools and hired for jobs based on their ability. It is unfair to use race as a factor in the selection process. Reverse-discrimination is not a solution for racism. Some individuals in society are racist, but American society as a whole is not. Preferential treatment of certain races through affirmative action is wrong.

Death Penalty 
Liberal Comprehension
The death penalty should be abolished. It is inhumane and is ‘cruel and unusual' punishment. Imprisonment is the appropriate punishment for murder. Every execution risks killing an innocent person.

Conservative Belief
The death penalty is a punishment that fits the crime of murder; it is neither ‘cruel' nor ‘unusual.' Executing a murderer is the appropriate punishment for taking an innocent life.

Liberal Comprehension
A market system in which government regulates the economy is best. Government must protect citizens from the greed of big business. Unlike the private sector, the government is motivated by public interest. Government regulation in all areas of the economy is needed to level the playing field.

Conservative Belief
The free market system, competitive capitalism, and private enterprise create the greatest opportunity and the highest standard of living for all. Free markets produce more economic growth, more jobs and higher standards of living than those systems burdened by excessive government regulation.

Education - vouchers & charter schools  
Liberal Comprehension
Public schools are the best way to educate students. Vouchers take money away from public schools. Government should focus additional funds on existing public schools, raising teacher salaries and reducing class size.

Conservative Belief
School vouchers create competition and therefore encourage schools to improve performance. Vouchers will give all parents the right to choose good schools for their children, not just those who can afford private schools.

Embryonic Stem Cell Research   
Liberal Comprehension
Support the use of embryonic stem cells for research. It is necessary (and ethical) for the government to fund embryonic stem cell research, which will assist scientists in finding treatments and cures for diseases. An embryo is not a human. The tiny blastocyst (embryos used in embryonic stem cell research) has no human features. Experimenting on embryos/embryonic stem cells is not murder. Embryonic stem cells have the potential to cure chronic and degenerative diseases which current medicine has been unable to effectively treat. Embryonic stem cells have been shown to be effective in treating heart damage in mice.

Conservative Belief
Support the use of adult and umbilical cord stem cells only for research. It is morally and ethically wrong for the government to fund embryonic stem cell research. Human life begins at conception. The extraction of stem cells from an embryo requires its destruction. In other words, it requires that a human life be killed. Adult stem cells have already been used to treat spinal cord injuries, Leukemia, and even Parkinson's disease. Adult stem cells are derived from umbilical cords, placentas, amniotic fluid, various tissues and organ systems like skin and the liver, and even fat obtained from liposuction. Embryonic stem cells have not been successfully used to help cure disease.

Liberal Comprehension
Oil is a depleting resource. Other sources of energy must be explored. The government must produce a national plan for all energy resources and subsidize (partially pay for) alternative energy research and production. Support increased exploration of alternative energy sources such as wind and solar power. Support government control of gas and electric industries.

Conservative Belief
Oil, gas and coal are all good sources of energy and are abundant in the U.S. Oil drilling should be increased both on land and at sea. Increased domestic production creates lower prices and less dependence on other countries for oil. Support increased production of nuclear energy. Wind and solar sources will never provide plentiful, affordable sources of power. Support private ownership of gas and electric industries.

Euthanasia & Physician-assisted suicide   
Liberal Comprehension
Euthanasia should be legalized. A person has a right to die with dignity, by his own choice. A terminally ill person should have the right to choose to end pain and suffering. It is wrong for the government to take away the means for a terminally ill person to hasten his death. It is wrong to force a person to go through so much pain and suffering. Legalizing euthanasia would not lead to doctor-assisted suicides of non-critical patients. Permitting euthanasia would reduce health care costs, which would then make funds available for those who could truly benefit from medical care.

Conservative Belief
Neither euthanasia nor physician-assisted suicide should be legalized. It is immoral and unethical to deliberately end the life of a terminally ill person (euthanasia), or enable another person to end their own life (assisted suicide). The goal should be compassionate care and easing the suffering of terminally ill people. Legalizing euthanasia could lead to doctor-assisted suicides of non-critical patients. If euthanasia were legalized, insurance companies could pressure doctors to withhold life-saving treatment for dying patients. Many religions prohibit suicide and euthanasia. These practices devalue human life.

Global Warming/Climate Change
Liberal Comprehension
Global warming is caused by an increased production of carbon dioxide through the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas). The U.S. is a major contributor to global warming because it produces 25% of the world’s carbon dioxide. Proposed laws to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S. are urgently needed and should be enacted immediately to save the planet. Many reputable scientists support this theory.

Conservative Belief
Change in global temperature is natural over long periods of time. Science has not shown that humans can affect permanent change to the earth’s temperature. Proposed laws to reduce carbon emissions will do nothing to help the environment and will cause significant price increases for all. Many reputable scientists support this theory.

Gun Control
Liberal Comprehension
The Second Amendment does not give citizens the right to keep and bear arms, but only allows for the state to keep a militia (National Guard). Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military. Additional gun control laws are necessary to stop gun violence and limit the ability of criminals to obtain guns. More guns mean more violence.

Conservative Belief
The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to keep and bear arms. Individuals have the right to defend themselves. There are too many gun control laws – additional laws will not lower gun crime rates. What is needed is enforcement of current laws. Gun control laws do not prevent criminals from obtaining guns. More guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens mean less crime.

Full text of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Liberal Comprehension
Support free or low-cost government controlled health care. There are millions of Americans who can’t afford health care and are deprived of this basic right. Every American has a right to affordable health care. The government should provide equal health care benefits for all, regardless of their ability to pay.

Conservative Belief
Support competitive, free market health care system. All Americans have access to health care. The debate is about who should pay for it. Free and low-cost government-run programs (socialized medicine) result in higher costs and everyone receiving the same poor-quality health care. Health care should remain privatized. The problem of uninsured individuals should be addressed and solved within the free market healthcare system – the government should not control healthcare.

Homeland Security
Liberal Comprehension
Airport security – Passenger profiling is wrong, period. Selection of passengers for extra security screening should be random. Using other criteria (such as ethnicity) is discriminatory and offensive to Arabs and Muslims, who are generally innocent and law-abiding. Terrorists don’t fit a profile.

“…Arabs, Muslims and South Asians are no more likely than whites to be terrorists.” (American Civil Liberties Union ACLU)

Asked on 60 Minutes if a 70-year-old white woman from Vero Beach should receive the same level of scrutiny as a Muslim from Jersey City, President Obama’s Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta said, “Basically, I would hope so.”

Conservative Belief
Airport security – Choosing passengers randomly for extra security searches is not effective. Rather, profiling and intelligence data should be used to single out passengers for extra screening. Those who do not meet the criteria for suspicion should not be subjected to intense screening. The terrorists currently posing a threat to the U.S. are primarily Islamic/Muslim men between the ages of 18 and 38. Our resources should be focused on this group. Profiling is good logical police work.

“If people are offended (by profiling), that’s unfortunate, but I don’t think we can afford to take the risk that terrorism brings to us. They’ve wasted masses of resources on far too many people doing things that really don’t have a big payoff in terms of security.” – Northwestern University Aviation Expert, A.Gellman.

Liberal Comprehension
Support legal immigration. Support amnesty for those who enter the U.S. illegally (undocumented immigrants). Also believe that undocumented immigrants have a right to:

-- all educational and health benefits that citizens receive (financial aid, welfare, social security and medicaid), regardless of legal status.

-- the same rights as American citizens. It is unfair to arrest millions of undocumented immigrants.

Conservative Belief
Support legal immigration only. Oppose amnesty for those who enter the U.S. illegally (illegal immigrants). Those who break the law by entering the U.S. illegally do not have the same rights as those who obey the law and enter legally. The borders should be secured before addressing the problem of the illegal immigrants currently in the country. The Federal Government should secure the borders and enforce current immigration law.

Private Property
Liberal Comprehension
Government has the right to use eminent domain (seizure of private property by the government--with compensation to the owner) to accomplish a public end.

Conservative Belief
Respect ownership and private property rights. Eminent domain (seizure of private property by the government--with compensation to the owner) in most cases is wrong. Eminent domain should not be used for private development.

Religion & Government
Liberal Comprehension
Support the separation of church and state. The Bill of Rights implies a separation of church and state. Religious expression has no place in government. The two should be completely separate. Government should not support religious expression in any way. All reference to God in public and government spaces should be removed (eg., the Ten Commandments should not be displayed in Federal buildings). Religious expression has no place in government.

Conservative Belief
The phrase “separation of church and state” is not in the Constitution. The First Amendment to the Constitution states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” This prevents the government from establishing a national church/denomination. However, it does not prohibit God from being acknowledged in schools and government buildings. Symbols of Christian heritage should not be removed from public and government spaces (eg., the Ten Commandments should continue to be displayed in Federal buildings). Government should not interfere with religion and religious freedom.

Same-sex Marriage
Liberal Comprehension
Marriage is the union of people who love each other. It should be legal for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals, to ensure equal rights for all. Support same-sex marriage. Opposed to the creation of a constitutional amendment establishing marriage as the union of one man and one woman. All individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation, have the right to marry. Prohibiting same-sex citizens from marrying denies them their civil rights. [Opinions vary on whether this issue is equal to civil rights for African Americans.]

Conservative Belief
Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Oppose same-sex marriage.

Support Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), passed in 1996, which affirms the right of states not to recognize same-sex marriages licensed in other states.

Requiring citizens to sanction same-sex relationships violates moral and religious beliefs of millions of Christians, Jews, Muslims and others, who believe marriage is the union of one man and one woman.

Social Security
Liberal Comprehension
The Social Security system should be protected at all costs. Reduction in future benefits is not a reasonable option. [Opinions vary on the extent of the current system's financial stability.]

Social Security provides a safety net for the nation's poor and needy. Changing the system would cause a reduction in benefits and many people would suffer as a result.

Conservative Belief
The Social Security system is in serious financial trouble. Major changes to the current system are urgently needed. In its current state, the Social Security system is not financially sustainable. It will collapse if nothing is done to address the problems. Many will suffer as a result. Social Security must be made more efficient through privatization and/or allowing individuals to manage their own savings.

Liberal Comprehension
Higher taxes (primarily for the wealthy) and a larger government are necessary to address inequity/injustice in society (government should help the poor and needy using tax dollars from the rich). Support a large government to provide for the needs of the people and create equality. Taxes enable the government to create jobs and provide welfare programs for those in need. Government programs are a caring way to provide for the poor and needy in society.

Conservative Belief
Lower taxes and a smaller government with limited power will improve the standard of living for all. Support lower taxes and a smaller government. Lower taxes create more incentive for people to work, save, invest, and engage in entrepreneurial endeavors. Money is best spent by those who earn it, not the government. Government programs encourage people to become dependent and lazy, rather than encouraging work and independence.

United Nations (UN)
Liberal Comprehension
The UN promotes peace and human rights. The United States has a moral and a legal obligation to support the United Nations (UN). The U.S. should not act as a sovereign nation, but as one member of a world community. The U.S. should submit its national interests to the greater good of the global community (as defined by the UN). The U.S. should defer to the UN in military/peacekeeping matters. The United Nations Charter gives the United Nations Security Council the power and responsibility to take collective action to maintain international peace and security. U.S. troops should submit to UN command.

Conservative Belief
The UN has repeatedly failed in its essential mission to promote world peace and human rights. The wars, genocide and human rights abuses taking place in many Human Rights Council member states (and the UN's failure to stop them) prove this point. History shows that the United States, not the UN, is the global force for spreading freedom, prosperity, tolerance and peace. The U.S. should never subvert its national interests to those of the UN. The U.S. should never place troops under UN control. U.S. military should always wear the U.S. military uniform, not that of UN peacekeepers. [Opinions vary on whether the U.S. should withdraw from the UN.]

War on Terror/Terrorism
Liberal Comprehension
Global warming, not terrorism, poses the greatest threat to the U.S., according to Democrats in Congress. Terrorism is a result of arrogant U.S. foreign policy. Good diplomacy is the best way to deal with terrorism. Relying on military force to defeat terrorism creates hatred that leads to more terrorism. Captured terrorists should be handled by law enforcement and tried in civilian courts.

Conservative Belief
Terrorism poses one of the greatest threats to the U.S. The world toward which the militant Islamists strive cannot peacefully co-exist with the Western world. In the last decade, militant Islamists have repeatedly attacked Americans and American interests here and abroad. Terrorists must be stopped and destroyed. The use of intelligence-gathering and military force are the best ways to defeat terrorism around the world. Captured terrorists should be treated as enemy combatants and tried in military courts.

Liberal Comprehension
Support welfare, including long-term welfare. Welfare is a safety net which provides for the needs of the poor. Welfare is necessary to bring fairness to American economic life. It is a device for protecting the poor.

Conservative Belief
Oppose long-term welfare. Opportunities should be provided to make it possible for those in need to become self-reliant. It is far more compassionate and effective to encourage people to become self-reliant, rather than allowing them to remain dependent on the government for provisions.

The above descriptive analysis of philosophical distinctions was prepared by: Copyright 2005, (revised 2010) StudentNewsDaily.com


ACB NEWSPAPER International Division     


The Democrat Party and liberals are changing our 
U.S. Justice Court of Law from 

"Innocent Until Proven Guilty," to:

Can President Trump
Make America Great Again
After 8 Years of SOCIALISM



http://www.israelnationalnews.com/ARUTZ SHEVA 7 NEWS  Israel National
NDTV NEW DELHI                  
















                               FRANCE  24/7 







AMERICAN PROSPERITY without Nonsensical Liberals; YES!

America is prosperous under President Trump but yet fallacious in its social philosophy of unity.  Here's the problem, in America today there are growing pains streaming from two different life philosophies delivering superficial courtesies and subterfuge to parallel in unison the ability to govern America's capitalistic society.  At issue is the dominance of liberal religion aka "political correctness" [2008-2016] and the resurgence of conservatism [2017].  The premise of such unity is drawn from an inaccurate assumption that if everyone can be prosperous with a job making a minimum of one hundred thousand dollars such will satisfy society in general.  Unfortunately the paramount issue is not being prosperous making a minimum of $100k although that would be nice, but the real issue is having to live around someone every morning, noon and night who does not share your morals and values.  Offsetting social/economic standards will completely traumatize your prosperity creating a delusive fallacy of living in a society of unity.  Reason being is because having abundant prosperity can only buy you limited peace and serenity but eventually you'll have to come face to face with those who despise you and your life philosophy.   THAT'S WHEN MORALS AND VALUSE CLASH at a restaurant similar to the incident of White House Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.   When properly evaluated the final assessment of the future for the United States of America reveals America will no longer be a united nation. It is unfortunate that this young country has reached its full potential of holding together the perfectly designed capitalistic system under a republic. 

As stated in prior commentary “Segregation Is Not A Bad Word”  http://bit.ly/1KwBJf5 supports all leading indicators the United States of America will be reorganized one way or another. " Liberal religion" of political correctness has taken full effect upon the once "Judeo-Christian" society of America. Liberalism has scorned capitalism and created a social dynamics that has villainized the U.S. Constitution. What makes the social level of America so volatile is the unparalleled virulence of liberals, which is rapidly growing everyday aka millennials.  If you can understand the law of thermal dynamics it’s possible to comprehend why there will be a secession of states in America. The only question that really remains is whether the division of states will be uncontested or will there be a second civil war?

When looking at how liberalism has thwarted conservatism and Christianity in America there must be an assessment taken to gauge how to unravel the populous which has become hostile to itself. This can be easily understood when examining the law of thermal dynamics. [Thermal Dynamics]; While looking at an outdoor fire you’ll notice how sparks fly upward, they fly upward according to an inviolable law of nature. This is the result of the inflexible scientific law of thermal dynamics that when a fire is built it creates heat which produces hot air that rises upward and pulls the light weight sparks up with it while separating from each other. The same dynamics apply to liberalism and conservatism.

In America the two life philosophies of liberalism and conservatism have produced a violent degree of social dynamics and social hostility between the two. There has to be a separation of liberalism and conservatism just as the law of thermal dynamics demands sparks be separated from heat. A simpler way of stating how segregation of liberalisms and conservatism will be accomplished is depicted in two fluids, oil and water. Oil and water will not mix no matter how you force or merge the two together. It’s a law of physics, oil can not assimilate with water, and neither can liberalism assimilate with conservatism. There are varying degrees of forcing oil and water to mimic assimilation but the guaranteed result will be separation. The mimicking time of unity between liberals and conservatives has reached its apex. Sparks and heat must be separated, oil and water must be separated, and without a doubt liberals and conservatives must be separated.

Only abusive politicians would want to lie and mentor the populous to believe that liberals and conservatives can live together in an American society. Such a lie has been broken up into many lies over the past five decades. The point of diminishing returns is on stage everyday in America proving that liberalism has destroyed the foundation of America’s Judeo-Christian faith. Remember, only politicians are the ones to reap the benefit of a mocked society of unity which continues to function on a false narrative best relayed by Rodney King stating “Can We All Just Get Alone?” The answer is an impregnable NO!   When the founding fathers developed the American Republic the design did not include garnering fragments of liberalism. Christianity was the base foundation to guide America in law and order coupled with capitalism and freedom.

Dr BearClayborn -Political Psychiatrist- http://bit.ly/2KmP4bN

ACB Newspaper International Editor in Chief 


What is the difference between a REPUBLIC and a DEMOCRACY?

In this modern American society the liability of truth is no longer a premise for judging social development or social justice.  Why not, you may ask?   Well, there are conditions that motivate culture priority to accept the standards of social development towards a republic or democracy entity.  What this means is the dominating culture dictates the social protocol.   But, the United States of America is somewhat special in coagulating cultures without setting up a dominate culture.  In so, America was not founded on hopes of social or culture superiority development.  If studied properly you will uncover how the U.S. Constitution has already designed the proper coagulated living concept for citizens.  The United States of America was founded on the principles of GOD [the True and Living God of the Holy Bible].  So you see, it’s like this; the more distance America places itself from the principles of GOD the liability of truth is no longer a premise or threat for judging the United States of America. 

In return, as the United States of America distance itself from GOD’s principles [enactment of 2008-2016 administration] the manifesting results illuminate a society activated by high level immorality, loss of national identity and a judicial system bent on constitutional anarchy.  Therefore the ability for America’s current generation to comprehend itself as either a republic or a democracy is lost, along with its constitutional laws.

Once you’ve understood the foundational principals that America was established upon, then and only then can you understand the difference between a REPUBLIC and a DEMOCRACY!    

The United States of America is a mixture of the two systems of government (Republic under Common Law, and democracy under statutory law).  Please understand this basic principle; Citizens will enjoy their God-given natural rights in a Republic.  On the other side of the coin, in a democracy the Citizens enjoy only government granted privileges (also known as civil rights).

Whenever a generation of youth can’t identify with its country’s foundation or history, that country is put on notice to be forgotten in due time and history.  As such older Americans have forgotten their pledge of allegiance to America, and their children will never know what a pledge of allegiance is:

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,
and to the Republic for which it stands,
one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

In the Pledge of Allegiance we all pledge allegiance to our Republic, not to a democracy.  “Republic" is the proper description of our government, not "democracy."  There must be a social and public awareness regarding that distinction.
A republic and a democracy are identical in every aspect except one.  In a republic the sovereignty is in each individual person.   In a democracy the sovereignty is in the group.


Republic:  That form of government in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. [NOTE:  The word "people" may be either plural or singular.  In a republic the group only has advisory powers; the sovereign individual is free to reject the majority group-think.  USA/exception:  if 100% of a jury convicts, then the individual loses sovereignty and is subject to group-think as in a democracy.]

Democracy:   That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. [NOTE:  In a pure democracy, 51% beats 49%. In other words, the minority has no rights.  The minority only has those privileges granted by the dictatorship of the majority.]

The distinction between our Republic and a democracy is not an idle one.  It has great legal significance.  The Constitution guarantees to every state a Republican form of government (Art. 4, Sec. 4).   No state may join the United States unless it is a Republic.  Our Republic is one dedicated to "liberty and justice for all."  Minority individual rights are the priority. The people have natural rights instead of civil rights.  The people are protected by the Bill of Rights from the majority.  One vote in a jury can stop all of the majority from depriving any one of the people of his rights; this would not be so if the United States were a democracy.   

In a pure democracy, 51 beats 49[%].   In a democracy there is no such thing as a significant minority: there are no minority rights except civil rights (privileges) granted by a condescending majority.  Only five of the U.S. Constitution's first ten amendments apply to Citizens of the United States.  Simply stated, a democracy is a dictatorship of the majority.  Socrates was executed by a democracy:  though he harmed no one, the majority found him intolerable.


Government:  The government is but an agency of the state, distinguished as it must be in accurate thought from its scheme and machinery of government. ....In a colloquial sense, the United States or its representatives, considered as the prosecutor in a criminal action; as in the phrase, "the government objects to the witness."   [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 625]

Government:  Republican government.  One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whome those powers are specially delegated.  In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.  [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626]

Democracy:   That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, pp. 388-389.
Note: Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, can be found in any law library and most law offices.


DEMOCRACY form of government:  An environmental organization proposes a bill for the ballot that every individual should reduce his water household usage by 25%. To assure that this goal is met, the government, or private sector, will monitor every individual's household water consumption rate.  If an individual does not meet the goal, his first offense is $500 fine.  Second offense is $750 fine and 30 days community service.  Third offense is $1,500 fine and 30 days imprisonment.  Fourth offense is $1,750 fine and 90 days imprisonment.  Fifth offense is a felony (1-year imprisonment) and $2,000 fine.

The people argue this environmental issue back and forth.  They argue the pros and cons of the issue.  This great debate is held at town hall meetings.  Strong opinions are on both sides of the matter.  One side preaches, "It is for the common good!" The other side rebuttals, "This is control and not freedom, and loss of choice!" Election day occurs; the people go to the ballot box to settle the problem.  The majority won by a vote of 51% whereas the minority lost with a vote of 49%.  The minority is ignored.  The majority celebrates while the minority jeers in disappointment.  Since the majority won, the bill goes in effect.  As a result of the majority winning, every individual must reduce his household water usage by 25%. For the reason that the majority has mandatory powers in a democracy.  Those who wish to go against the collective (whole body politic) will be punished accordingly. The minority has neither voice nor rights to refuse to accept the dictatorial majority. Everything is mandatory in a democracy.

REPUBLIC form of government:  An environmental organization proposes a bill for the ballot that every individual should reduce his water household usage by 25%. To assure that this goal is met, the government, or private sector, will monitor every individual's household water consumption rate.  If an individual does not meet the goal, his first offense is $500 fine.  Second offense is $750 fine and 30 days community service.  Third offense is $1,500 fine and 30 days imprisonment.  Fourth offense is $1,750 fine and 90 days imprisonment.  Fifth offense is a felony (1-year imprisonment) and $2,000 fine.

The people argue this environmental issue back and forth.  They argue the pros and cons of the issue.  This great debate is held at town hall meetings.  Strong opinions are on both sides of the matter.  One side preaches, "It is for the common good!" The other side rebuttals, "This is control and not freedom, and loss of choice!" Election day occurs; the people go to the ballot box to settle the problem.  The majority won by a vote of 51% whereas the minority lost with a vote of 49%. The minority may have lost, but not all is gone.  The majority celebrates while the minority jeers in disappointment.  Since the majority won, the bill goes in effect.  As a result of the majority winning, it is advisory that every individual reduce his household water usage by 25%.  For the reason that the majority has advisory powers in a republic; bear in mind that each individual is equally sovereign in a republic, he is free to reject the majority.  He may choose to follow the majority and subject himself to the rule, or he may choose not to follow the majority and not subject himself to the rule.  The minority has a voice and rights to refuse to accept the majority. Everything is advisory in a republic. This brings liberty and peace to the realm.


Notice that in a Democracy, the sovereignty is in the whole body of the free citizens. The sovereignty is not divided to smaller units such as individual citizens.  To solve a problem, only the whole body politic is authorized to act.  Also, being citizens, individuals have duties and obligations to the government.  The government's only obligations to the citizens are those legislatively pre-defined for it by the whole body politic.

In a Republic, the sovereignty resides in the people themselves, whether one or many.  In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives as he chooses to solve a problem.  Further, the people have no obligation to the government; instead, the government being hired by the people is obliged to its owner, the people.

The people own the government agencies.  The government agencies own the citizens.  In the United States we have a three-tiered cast system consisting of people ---> government agencies ---> and citizens.

The people did "ordain and establish this Constitution," not for themselves, but "for the United States of America."  In delegating powers to the government agencies the people gave up none of their own.  (See Preamble of U.S. Constitution)  This adoption of this concept is why the U.S. has been called the "Great Experiment in self government."  The People govern themselves, while their agents (government agencies) perform tasks listed in the Preamble for the benefit of the People.  The experiment is to answer the question, "Can self-governing people coexist and prevail over government agencies that have no authority over the People?"

The citizens of the United States are totally subject to the laws of the United States (See 14th Amendment of U.S. Constitution).   NOTE: U.S. citizenship did not exist until July 28, 1868.

Actually, the United States is a mixture of the two systems of government (Republican under Common Law, and democratic under statutory law).  The People enjoy their God-given natural rights in the Republic.  In a democracy, the Citizens enjoy only government granted privileges (also known as civil rights).

There was a great political division between two major philosophers, Hobbes and Locke.  Hobbes was on the side of government.  He believed that sovereignty was vested in the state.  Locke was on the side of the People.  He believed that the fountain of sovereignty was the People of the state.  Statists prefer Hobbes.  Populists choose Locke.  In California, the Government Code sides with Locke. Sections 11120 and 54950 both say,  "The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them." The preambles of the U.S. and California Constitutions also affirm the choice of Locke by the People.

The question for the United States of America today is; will the United States of America remain a Republic and continue to value individual freedom, or become a collection of culture groups ruled by a dictator posing as a promoter of freedom via government rule?

Thomas Jefferson said that liberty and ignorance cannot coexist.  Will there be a continuation of the “Pledge of Allegiance” to support the 1776 established Republic [United States of America]?  Will there be a renewing of public knowledge to understand and comprehend the difference between a Republic and a democracy?


“If a NATION [AMERICA] expects to be IGNORANT and FREE in a STATE of civilization; then that NATION must EXPECT what NEVER WAS and NEVER WILL BE”    Thomas Jefferson, 1816.

These notes are courtesy of LAW NOTES