11/01/2025
300 YEAR Life Span for AMERICA is Very Doubtful
8/25/2025
DEMOCRAT PARTY "One Drop Black Blood Rule"
![]() |
| THE OLD DEMOCRAT PARTY HOUSE OF RACISM STILL STANDS! |
For a simple majority of "blacks" today in America they are simply far distant descendants of Africa, really really really far distant. This is because their blood line has been totally diffused by other blood lines that are not of African ancestry. Therefore they are correctly identified as FDA's {FAR DESCENDANTS OF AFRICA, or SDA's Simple DESCENDANTS OF AFRICA}. Accordingly the most definitive description of those who are not American caucasians finely fit the human origin of "PRIME MERIDIAN EAST." But so does all original groups of people who settled in early America unless they are descendants of American Indian; "PRIME MERIDIAN WEST" habitants.
We can not dismiss the other under majority of so-called-blacks in America whose blood line does not originate from Africa but of another priority blood line [Russian, Mexican, Italian, Japanese, French, German, etc.....]. The under majority of "so-called-blacks" don't dare identify themselves or attach themselves to the priority race based on skin tone.
FDA's and GFA's are simply to be known as AFRIGENs {modern century approach to identification}. The sad part of this genetic disclosure is that African descendants or African genetics have been brainwashed or propagandize into believing erroneously of themselves as a "color black." These "color black" people unfortunately have a comprehension and false biological assessment of an old pre-civil war identification of Prime Meridian East descendants that "one drop of black blood makes them black." Such ignorance deters them form grasping their true genetic mixture of various cultures.
BEST EXAMPLE: BARACK HUSSEIN DUNHAM OBAMA
Americans could not properly assess Barack Dunham mixed genealogy. Whites and blacks were perplexed about how Barack Dunham should he be referred to; should he be “black” or “mixed race”?
The reason many call him “black” can be traced back to the “one-drop” rule. This refers to a series of racist laws passed across America in the early twentieth century, which dictated that any person with as little as “one drop” of “black blood” were to be classified as legally “black”, thereby restricting their rights and entitlements within society. As a result, all people of biracial ancestry had their European ancestry DISCOUNTED involuntarily...
The fiction that Africans possessed a separate blood group to whites was used to explain differences in physical appearance, behavior and culture. The rule was first passed into law in Tennessee in 1910, and was then rapidly adopted across other states.
Although the restrictions were finally abolished by the late 1960s, their original classifications remain very much in use today, despite their roots in racism. While it has been relatively straightforward to reverse the law, it has not been so easy to reverse culture mentality— and so, people of mixed or biracial heritage are still considered by liberals, democrats and the Democrat Party as “black”.... Vanessa Williams, Tiger Woods, etc...
Fact: The 14th Amendment, giving full citizenship to freed slaves, passed in 1868 with 94% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress. The 15th Amendment, giving freed slaves the right to vote, passed in 1870 with 100% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress.
Regardless of what has happened since then, shouldn't we be grateful to the Republicans for these Amendments to the Constitution? And shouldn't we remember which party stood for freedom and which party fiercely opposed it?
Fact: The Ku Klux Klan was originally and primarily an arm of the Southern Democrat Party. Its mission was to terrorize freed slaves and "ni**er-loving" (their words) Republicans who sympathized with them.
Why is this fact conveniently omitted in so many popular histories and depictions of the KKK, including PBS documentaries? Had the KKK been founded by Republicans, that fact would no doubt be repeated constantly on those fake news shows.
Fact: The historic Civil Rights Act of 1964 was supported by a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress. In the House, 80 percent of the Republicans and 63 percent of the Democrats voted in favor. In the Senate, 82 percent of the Republicans and 69 percent of the Democrats voted for it.
Fact:
Contrary to popular misconception, the parties never "switched"
on racism. The Democrats just switched from overt racism to a
subversive strategy of getting blacks as dependent as possible on
government to secure their votes. At the same time, they began a
cynical smear campaign to label anyone who opposes their devious
strategy as greedy racists.Following the epic civil rights struggles of the 1960s, the South began a major demographic shift from Democratic to Republican dominance. Many believe that this shift was motivated by racism. While it is certainly true that many Southern racists abandoned the Democratic Party over its new support for racial equality and integration, the notion that they would flock to the Republican Party -- which was a century ahead of the Democrats on those issues -- makes no sense whatsoever.
Yet virtually every liberal, when pressed on the matter, will inevitably claim that the parties "switched," and most racist Democrats became Republicans! In their minds, this historical ju jitsu maneuver apparently transfers all the past sins of the Democrats (slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow laws, etc.) onto the Republicans and all the past virtues of the Republicans (e.g., ending slavery) onto the Democrats! That's quite a feat!
It is true that Barry Goldwater's opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 probably attracted some racist Democrats to the Republican Party. However, Goldwater was not a racist -- at least not an overt racist like so many Southern Democrats of the time, such as George Wallace and Bull Connor. He publicly professed racial equality, and his opposition to the 1964 Act was based on principled grounds of states rights. In any case, his libertarian views were out of step with the mainstream, and he lost the 1964 Presidential election to LBJ in a landslide.
But Goldwater's opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act provided liberals an opening to tar the Republican Party as racist, and they have tenaciously repeated that label so often over the years that it is now the conventional wisdom among liberals. But it is really nothing more than an unsubstantiated myth -- a convenient political lie. If the Republican Party was any more racist than the Democratic Party even in 1964, why did a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress vote for the 1964 Civil Rights Act? The idea that Goldwater's vote on the 1964 Civil Rights Act trumps a century of history of the Republican Party is ridiculous, to say the least.
A more likely explanation for the long-term shift from Democratic to Republican dominance in the South was the perception, fair or not, that the Democratic Party had rejected traditional Christian religious values and embraced radical secularism. That includes its hard line support for abortion, its rejection of prayer in public schools, its promotion of the gay agenda, and many other issues.
In
the 1960s the Democratic Party changed its strategy for dealing with
African Americans [FDA's]. Thanks to earlier Republican initiatives on civil
rights, blatant racial oppression was no longer a viable political
option. Whereas before that time Southern Democrats had overtly and
proudly segregated and terrorized blacks [FDA's], the national Democratic
Party decided instead to be more subtle and get them as dependent on
government as possible. As LBJ so elegantly put it (in a famous
moment of candor that was recorded for posterity), "I'll have
those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years." At the
same time, the Democrats started a persistent campaign of lies and
innuendo, falsely equating any opposition to their welfare state with
racism.From a purely cynical political perspective, the Democratic strategy of black
Most major American city governments have been run by liberal Democrats for decades, and most of those cities have large black [FDA's] sections that are essentially dysfunctional anarchist Cities like Detroit are overrun by gangs and drug dealers, with burned out homes on every block in some areas. The land values are so low due to crime, blight, and lack of economic opportunity that condemned homes are not even worth rebuilding. Who wants to build a home in an urban war zone? Yet they keep electing liberal Democrats -- and blaming "racist" Republicans for their problems!
Washington DC is another city that has been dominated by liberal Democrats for decades. It spends more per capital on students than almost any other city in the world, yet it has some of the worst academic achievement anywhere and is a drug-infested hellhole. Barack Hussein Dunham Obama would never had sent his precious daughters to a DC public schools, but the hypocrisy comes clear in that he assured America that DC public schools were good enough for everyone, but not his children. In fact,
Barack Hussein Dunham Obama was instrumental in killing a popular and effective school voucher program in DC, effectively killing hopes for many poor black [FDA's] families trapped in those dysfunctional public schools. Barrack Hussein Dunham Obama allegiance to the teachers unions apparently trumps his concern for poor black [FDA's] families.
A strong argument could also be made that Democratic support for perpetual affirmative action is racist. It is, after all, the antithesis of Martin Luther King's dream of a color-blind society. Not only is it "reverse racism," but it is based on the premise that African Americans [FDA's] are incapable of competing in the free market on a level playing field. In other words, it is based on the notion of white supremacy, albeit "benevolent" white supremacy rather than the openly hostile white supremacy of the pre-1960s Democratic Party.
The next time someone claims that Republicans are racist and Democrats are not, don't fall for it, just look at them like they're crazy.
Recommended Reading
Back to Basics for the Republican Party by Michael Zak
Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party's Buried Past by Bruce Bartlett
RussP.us
8/11/2025
YOUNG FOOLS GOLD
FYI: Young Working Americans......
Whatever your investment venue is, PLEASE DO NOT GAMBLE ON -OR USE CRYPTO CURRENCY. You've been given a fair warning!
As America's capitalistic society changes into socialism and eventually communism, the perils of investment looms over the head of a young working class investor. Today's American government is force feeding young investors to buy into the "climate change world." Well, anytime any government place strong input into where you should spend your money, be assured you're going to lose your hard earned money, very quickly.
After 2008 all bets have been taken off the table for securing simple sound investments. There was a time investors selected the industrial and manufacturing markets for investment opportunities, not so today. Oh sure, there are a few of the usual investment stocks available. Unfortunately corporate ownership or management changes quite often in today's unstable stock market; and such will affect your shareholder stock.
As of January 2022 Amazon has a market cap of $1.691 Trillion . This makes Amazon the world's 5th most valuable company by market cap. But, as a young hard working citizen who've just entered the job market and desire to start investing, can you afford to buy twenty five issued Amazon stocks [1 share/ $3,270.00] x 25 = $81,750.00 bucks]? Of course you can't, unless you were born in a rich celebrity or pro athlete family, or a filthy rich democrat party family like Nancy Pelosi.
Therefore as a young hard working individual who is trying to get traction investing and avoiding as much government induced IRA promotions, you may want to create your own investment portfolio. It will take a lot of effort to manage your hands- on investment, but you'll save money doing so. There are so many ways to profit from your collection of assets. Your assets could be any combination of investments, like stocks, bonds, mutual funds and exchange-traded funds. Your investment portfolio is literally just a concept than a hands-on physical source, unless you invest in physical gold or physical property.
RESEARCH YOUR POSSIBILITY OF RETIREMENT WEALTH
Every century down through the ages there have
always been two things on this earth that haven't failed for securing
retirement wealth:
1. purchase land [acres] 2. purchase gold [precious metals]...
Regardless if you live in a "socialist/communist" country [
Land and Gold may fluctuate in depreciation slightly at times [price swing] but land and gold have never collapsed in value since the earth was made [unless you invested in
Need Proof??? Research and compare the price of land in NY,
As for a "poor man's investment option" like mine, or even a rich person investment option, buying stock in precious metal corporations or companies "mining" for natural resources [gold/silver/copper/titanium/platinum/diamond/ruby/sapphire etc...] is a feasible option for low capital fund investment or low-out-of-pocket-expense.
INVESTMENT PARTICULARS of LAND and GOLD
When buying land [acreage] you must "assess the location." Remember,
the closer to water [ocean, large lakes, rivers] the price is normally higher
in cost. Regardless of the price it is without a doubt you'll make a profit from holding the land.
When buying gold [precious metals] you have options of owning physical-in-your-hand investment or purchase through a storage brokerage [secured holding facility vault].
SELECTING your INVESTMENTS
YOUNG FOOLS GOLD
WHATEVER YOU DO, DON'T GET HOOKED INTO BUYING THE CRYPTOCURRENCY. Don't even consider jumping into the CLIMATE CHANGE GAMUT, which involves government influence. Take heed and a special pause to buy stock in "vehicles of the future" [ELECTRIC VEHICLES]. In doing so you'll gamble away a lot of your money before you can make a breakeven profit on your return within a year.
Remember this true fact about investing in renewable energy stock [windmills, solar, batteries]. If there is no wind, there is no power created from windmills to make electricity. Also if there is no sunlight available there is no power created from solar panels to make electricity. Which brings us to EV stock [electric vehicle and lithium battery] purchase. Electric vehicles only operate by electricity.
Such renewable energy stocks [windmill, solar, lithium battery] are very vulnerable. Remember this point; it only took a simple Texas 2021 ice storm to shutdown all renewable energy sources completely. In addition, remember the Virginia I95 winter storm 2022 that shutdown I95 for over twenty hours, and electric vehicle drivers had no electricity to operate their vehicles period [no heat, no movement]. Such are examples of investing in stocks that are highly volatile by simple activity of everyday local, state, national and global weather.
Buy renewable stocks if you want to, but good luck, due to that investment pendulum swinging the wrong way often and you'll have to monitor daily such investments. On the other hand if you purchase land or precious metals you'll have more flexibility in gauging your profit as the pendulum remains in a constant movement building your retirement wealth.
Just Thinking,,,,,,,,,,,,Juuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuust Thinking!
Enjoy your investment options; now go do your own research.
6/07/2025
MEDICAL HISTORY REBUTTALS CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC HOAX
MEDICAL HISTORY FIRMLY REBUTTALS
Yes, COVID-19 is a real virus, but it's was used as a 2020 political ploy. Coronavirus has been around for thousands of years and it is inevitable that deaths must occur. Each coronavirus create extensions of its virus capabilities just as any virus, and must cycle the globe. 99% of the American voting population can not comprehend a virus "R0" rating; therefore they easily fall prey to "political fear tactics" from liberal media's promotion of coronavirus hysteria. PLEASE READ CDC reference to "R0" below:
Comprehending "R0" severity; the main objective is to understand what is an "R0" ASSESSMENT of a virus.
The "R0" directly reflects how far a virus can spread between humans.
The "R0" is identified and known as the reproduction number of a virus.
The "R0" relates to how many other people the virus carrier [person] can actually infect.
FACTUAL "R0" ANALYSIS
1918 SPANISH FLU coronavirus pandemic; had a critical case-fatality ratio of 5%
2003 SARS coronavirus; origin China had a devastating population case-fatality ratio of 10%
2009 H1N1 coronavirus pandemic SWINE FLU; destructive "R0" was 1.2 to 1.6
2020 COVID19 coronavirus 12month cycle estimate; "R0" of 1.4 to 2.5
Comparing severity of COVID-19 to MEASLES:
MEASLES have the monstrous ability to exterminate a population with an "R0" of 12 to 18
Public malignancy to study historical pattern of coronavirus allows liberal media to sway public into "doomsday."
Coronavirus extensions must cycle through the global as all coronaviruses have in the past five thousand years; deaths are inevitable.
EVERYONE MUST EDUCATE THEMSELVES on "R0"
Research and Compare COVID-19 "R0" severity with MEASLES "R0"
Something is wrong; the COVID-19 numbers rapidly
escalating without a pattern. What are the itemized
details of each patient's pre-medical condition?
COVID-19 is just an extension of influenza; therefore these numbers should be contrasted to annual pneumonia/influenza death rates or pneumonia illnesses causing deaths.
NOTE: In the 2019 flu season over 34,000 Americans died from H1N1; but these figures doesn't include the estimates from AH3N2
or Influenza B viruses= BYamagata and BVictoriahe. The total of all clades will easily access the actual deaths beyond 34,000 to over 55,000 deaths in America for the 2019 flu season....
Session a. Over Sensationalized Numbers.
The Lancet Medical Journal warns any estimates should be “treated with great caution because not all patients have concluded their illness (ie, recovered or died) and the true number of infections and full disease spectrum are unknown”.









