11/01/2025
300 YEAR Life Span for AMERICA is Very Doubtful
8/25/2025
DEMOCRAT PARTY "One Drop Black Blood Rule"
![]() |
| THE OLD DEMOCRAT PARTY HOUSE OF RACISM STILL STANDS! |
For a simple majority of "blacks" today in America they are simply far distant descendants of Africa, really really really far distant. This is because their blood line has been totally diffused by other blood lines that are not of African ancestry. Therefore they are correctly identified as FDA's {FAR DESCENDANTS OF AFRICA, or SDA's Simple DESCENDANTS OF AFRICA}. Accordingly the most definitive description of those who are not American caucasians finely fit the human origin of "PRIME MERIDIAN EAST." But so does all original groups of people who settled in early America unless they are descendants of American Indian; "PRIME MERIDIAN WEST" habitants.
We can not dismiss the other under majority of so-called-blacks in America whose blood line does not originate from Africa but of another priority blood line [Russian, Mexican, Italian, Japanese, French, German, etc.....]. The under majority of "so-called-blacks" don't dare identify themselves or attach themselves to the priority race based on skin tone.
FDA's and GFA's are simply to be known as AFRIGENs {modern century approach to identification}. The sad part of this genetic disclosure is that African descendants or African genetics have been brainwashed or propagandize into believing erroneously of themselves as a "color black." These "color black" people unfortunately have a comprehension and false biological assessment of an old pre-civil war identification of Prime Meridian East descendants that "one drop of black blood makes them black." Such ignorance deters them form grasping their true genetic mixture of various cultures.
BEST EXAMPLE: BARACK HUSSEIN DUNHAM OBAMA
Americans could not properly assess Barack Dunham mixed genealogy. Whites and blacks were perplexed about how Barack Dunham should he be referred to; should he be “black” or “mixed race”?
The reason many call him “black” can be traced back to the “one-drop” rule. This refers to a series of racist laws passed across America in the early twentieth century, which dictated that any person with as little as “one drop” of “black blood” were to be classified as legally “black”, thereby restricting their rights and entitlements within society. As a result, all people of biracial ancestry had their European ancestry DISCOUNTED involuntarily...
The fiction that Africans possessed a separate blood group to whites was used to explain differences in physical appearance, behavior and culture. The rule was first passed into law in Tennessee in 1910, and was then rapidly adopted across other states.
Although the restrictions were finally abolished by the late 1960s, their original classifications remain very much in use today, despite their roots in racism. While it has been relatively straightforward to reverse the law, it has not been so easy to reverse culture mentality— and so, people of mixed or biracial heritage are still considered by liberals, democrats and the Democrat Party as “black”.... Vanessa Williams, Tiger Woods, etc...
Fact: The 14th Amendment, giving full citizenship to freed slaves, passed in 1868 with 94% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress. The 15th Amendment, giving freed slaves the right to vote, passed in 1870 with 100% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress.
Regardless of what has happened since then, shouldn't we be grateful to the Republicans for these Amendments to the Constitution? And shouldn't we remember which party stood for freedom and which party fiercely opposed it?
Fact: The Ku Klux Klan was originally and primarily an arm of the Southern Democrat Party. Its mission was to terrorize freed slaves and "ni**er-loving" (their words) Republicans who sympathized with them.
Why is this fact conveniently omitted in so many popular histories and depictions of the KKK, including PBS documentaries? Had the KKK been founded by Republicans, that fact would no doubt be repeated constantly on those fake news shows.
Fact: The historic Civil Rights Act of 1964 was supported by a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress. In the House, 80 percent of the Republicans and 63 percent of the Democrats voted in favor. In the Senate, 82 percent of the Republicans and 69 percent of the Democrats voted for it.
Fact:
Contrary to popular misconception, the parties never "switched"
on racism. The Democrats just switched from overt racism to a
subversive strategy of getting blacks as dependent as possible on
government to secure their votes. At the same time, they began a
cynical smear campaign to label anyone who opposes their devious
strategy as greedy racists.Following the epic civil rights struggles of the 1960s, the South began a major demographic shift from Democratic to Republican dominance. Many believe that this shift was motivated by racism. While it is certainly true that many Southern racists abandoned the Democratic Party over its new support for racial equality and integration, the notion that they would flock to the Republican Party -- which was a century ahead of the Democrats on those issues -- makes no sense whatsoever.
Yet virtually every liberal, when pressed on the matter, will inevitably claim that the parties "switched," and most racist Democrats became Republicans! In their minds, this historical ju jitsu maneuver apparently transfers all the past sins of the Democrats (slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow laws, etc.) onto the Republicans and all the past virtues of the Republicans (e.g., ending slavery) onto the Democrats! That's quite a feat!
It is true that Barry Goldwater's opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 probably attracted some racist Democrats to the Republican Party. However, Goldwater was not a racist -- at least not an overt racist like so many Southern Democrats of the time, such as George Wallace and Bull Connor. He publicly professed racial equality, and his opposition to the 1964 Act was based on principled grounds of states rights. In any case, his libertarian views were out of step with the mainstream, and he lost the 1964 Presidential election to LBJ in a landslide.
But Goldwater's opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act provided liberals an opening to tar the Republican Party as racist, and they have tenaciously repeated that label so often over the years that it is now the conventional wisdom among liberals. But it is really nothing more than an unsubstantiated myth -- a convenient political lie. If the Republican Party was any more racist than the Democratic Party even in 1964, why did a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress vote for the 1964 Civil Rights Act? The idea that Goldwater's vote on the 1964 Civil Rights Act trumps a century of history of the Republican Party is ridiculous, to say the least.
A more likely explanation for the long-term shift from Democratic to Republican dominance in the South was the perception, fair or not, that the Democratic Party had rejected traditional Christian religious values and embraced radical secularism. That includes its hard line support for abortion, its rejection of prayer in public schools, its promotion of the gay agenda, and many other issues.
In
the 1960s the Democratic Party changed its strategy for dealing with
African Americans [FDA's]. Thanks to earlier Republican initiatives on civil
rights, blatant racial oppression was no longer a viable political
option. Whereas before that time Southern Democrats had overtly and
proudly segregated and terrorized blacks [FDA's], the national Democratic
Party decided instead to be more subtle and get them as dependent on
government as possible. As LBJ so elegantly put it (in a famous
moment of candor that was recorded for posterity), "I'll have
those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years." At the
same time, the Democrats started a persistent campaign of lies and
innuendo, falsely equating any opposition to their welfare state with
racism.From a purely cynical political perspective, the Democratic strategy of black
Most major American city governments have been run by liberal Democrats for decades, and most of those cities have large black [FDA's] sections that are essentially dysfunctional anarchist Cities like Detroit are overrun by gangs and drug dealers, with burned out homes on every block in some areas. The land values are so low due to crime, blight, and lack of economic opportunity that condemned homes are not even worth rebuilding. Who wants to build a home in an urban war zone? Yet they keep electing liberal Democrats -- and blaming "racist" Republicans for their problems!
Washington DC is another city that has been dominated by liberal Democrats for decades. It spends more per capital on students than almost any other city in the world, yet it has some of the worst academic achievement anywhere and is a drug-infested hellhole. Barack Hussein Dunham Obama would never had sent his precious daughters to a DC public schools, but the hypocrisy comes clear in that he assured America that DC public schools were good enough for everyone, but not his children. In fact,
Barack Hussein Dunham Obama was instrumental in killing a popular and effective school voucher program in DC, effectively killing hopes for many poor black [FDA's] families trapped in those dysfunctional public schools. Barrack Hussein Dunham Obama allegiance to the teachers unions apparently trumps his concern for poor black [FDA's] families.
A strong argument could also be made that Democratic support for perpetual affirmative action is racist. It is, after all, the antithesis of Martin Luther King's dream of a color-blind society. Not only is it "reverse racism," but it is based on the premise that African Americans [FDA's] are incapable of competing in the free market on a level playing field. In other words, it is based on the notion of white supremacy, albeit "benevolent" white supremacy rather than the openly hostile white supremacy of the pre-1960s Democratic Party.
The next time someone claims that Republicans are racist and Democrats are not, don't fall for it, just look at them like they're crazy.
Recommended Reading
Back to Basics for the Republican Party by Michael Zak
Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party's Buried Past by Bruce Bartlett
RussP.us
6/25/2025
WORLD-LAW AGAINST Homosexuality
Christians should not be blamed for the indictment against homosexuality, it would be totally unfair, irresponsible and wicked on the part of liberals to do so.. We live in a world where 99.9% of global population don't adhere to or believe in anti-procreation. This is called "WORLD LAW AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY."

Christianity and Homosexuality The Bible delivers an uncompromised stance on homosexuality as noted in scripture. “They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.” (Romans 1:25-27) 2011 Research indicates 2.3 billion people made up the world’s Christian population
"Of all the creatures in the world, will ye approach males, and leave those whom Allah has created for you to be your mates? Nay, ye are a people transgressing (all limits)! They said: "If thou desist not, O Lut! thou wilt assuredly be cast out!" He said: "I do detest your doings:" "O my Lord! deliver me and my family from such things as they do!" So We delivered him and his family,- all Except an old woman who lingered behind. But the rest We destroyed utterly. We rained down on them a shower (of brimstone): and evil was the shower on those who were admonished (but heeded not)! Verily in this is a Sign: but most of them do not believe. And verily thy Lord is He, the Exalted in Might, Most Merciful." (Qur'an 26:165-175)
"Would ye really approach men in your lusts rather than women? Nay, ye are a people (grossly) ignorant! But his people gave no other answer but this: They said, "Drive out the followers of Lut from your city: these are indeed men who want to be clean and pure!" But We saved him and his family, except his wife; her We destined to be of those who lagged behind. And We rained down on them a shower (of brimstone): and evil was the shower on those who were admonished (but heeded not)!" (Qur'an 27:55-58)
"And (remember) Lut: behold, he said to his people: "Ye do commit lewdness, such as no people in Creation (ever) committed before you. Do ye indeed approach men, and cut off the highway? - and practice wickedness (even) in your councils?" But his people gave no answer but this: they said: "Bring us the Wrath of Allah if thou tellest the truth." (Qur'an 29:28-29)
"If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way. If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful." (Qur'an 4:15-16) 2011 Research indicates 1.6 billion people made up the world’s Muslim religion population.
Only a young nation like America could conjure up intestinal fortitude to restructure human living into an unacceptable and unnatural way of human life. While doing so, it tries to escape from the natural and normal human standards established thousands of years ago for procreation. Time and time again when a country like America tries to defy the laws of nature and world law they end up governed by political corruption, anarchy and homofascism. Such results are illuminated on a world stage revealing that nation’s loss of self respect, world respect and sovereignty. It’s inevitable!
6/18/2025
ARE VACINNATED PEOPLE Carriers of Coronavirus?
REPUBLISHED FROM - - WORLD NEWS CROSSROADS 2021 ARCHIVES
ARE VACINNATED PEOPLE CARRIERS OF CORONAVIRUS???
COMMON SENSE SHOULD APPLY TO THESE QUESTIONS; unfortunately liberals don't have common sense.
QUESTION; Are people who have been vaccinated for coronavirus capable of passing the virus to others?
THE
ANSWER: Yes, of course people who are vaccinated will pass on the virus because “THEY
ARE CARRYING THE VIRUS!”
Here’s the reason why they can and will pass the virus to others:
COVID SHOTS, FLU SHOTS, VARIANT SHOTS, OMICRON SHOTS,
SWINE FLU SHOTS or INFLUENZA SHOTS are made from the CORONAVIRUS itself [influenza]. Please read and cipher the historical medical
background information on influenza /aka coronavirus below:
The FIRST LEVEL of reality towards
comprehending COVID-19 or coronavirus is to study its history. In doing so
you’ll find that Influenza has been around since the existence of human life.
Everyone has a strand of coronavirus within them. Coronavirus has circled the
earth in cycles for thousands of years and now has become a permanent
attachment of the cell structure, being stapled to the human biological
structure of today.
The SECOND LEVEL of reality towards comprehending COVID-19
is to realize individuals who take annual flu shots are the main carriers of
the influenza virus. The reality is based on actual flu shots being taken.
These flu shots are composed literally of the influenza virus, better known as
“coronavirus.” Intake of flu shots guarantees the virus to be implanted in the
human body through flu vaccine inoculation. According to “flu experts,”
influenza (flu) vaccine works by triggering your immune system to produce
antibodies that help the body prevent the flu. MOST of the
The THIRD LEVEL of reality towards comprehending COVID-19
is the collaboration of leading scientist and physicians mandating Americans to
take annual Flu Shots. These leading scientists and physicians are overly
intellectually endowed in that they can’t see the legal promotion of spreading
influenza. It is for certainty that everyone who takes a flu shot or covid shot
become literal culprits of spreading influenza. Simply put, they are the base
and foundation of coronavirus regardless if they’re sick or not. But they will
become sick at some time and point from implanted coronavirus or an external
contraction.
If anyone wishes to refute the information being providing please research first before advancing your premise. Please do not copy or paste “daily internet hot topics on coronavirus” because you would be passing on propaganda material by the same entities that created this so-called pandemic; which actually is a political hoax for medical tyranny. Yes, coronavirus [influenza/pneumonia] is real; it has been for thousands of years. Dr BearClayborn –Political Psychiatrist- Editor in Chief- ACB Newspaper Intl
RECAP of American Medical Tyranny
I don't want to call anyone a "medical tyranny dummy," but I told everyone that covid-19 was a complete political hoax at the beginning of 2020. Medical history [influenza/coronavirus] had already laid out the performing medical factors of becoming a mandated vaccinated individual; your body becoming a permanent host to coronavirus. Medical history [influenza/coronavirus] has also laid out performing medical factors and consequences of individuals avoiding mandated vaccines; allowing the natural immune system to work as it should.
In other words, there has never been a mandated requirement or enforcement for humans in world history to receive an influenza [coronavirus] vaccine. Thereby such has always been an individual medical preference and not government enforcement. Some people take their yearly flu-shot, while others over the centuries simply ignored taking a flu-shot. Individuals rejecting vaccine shots over the centuries have been living a normal medical life, because their natural immune system works in accordance to combat invading viruses.
Dr BearClayborn -Political Psychiatrist-Editor in Chief-ACB Newspaper Intl
Attn: Please note that any future pandemic will originate from those in the global tyranny-control group, producing such medical diabolical population control. Global tyrants of today are no longer interested in just making money, they are seriously demonically possessed with vile intent to control the population of every country on this earth; via medical emergency [pandemic]...
Decades ago [fifty years] "children Saturday morning cartoons" would often portray wicked "mad scientists" that wanted to rule the world. Well, today those cartoon-mad-scientists are no longer a figment of the imagination, they are actually real and living throughout various governments on this earth. Top tier American medical scientists, biological chemist experts and pharmaceutical corporate CEO's are in cooperation with the World Health Organization and CDC. Such entities are controlled by a solidified global tyrant group known as the "New World Order."











