DC UNI-PARTY or SEPARATION OF STATES

Separation of States is not a theoretical or conjectural concept, but a reality that world history has monitored for thousands of civilizations.  Today the reality of "Separation of States" has annex the United States of America.  Keep in mind recent world history disclosing "Separation of States" in that of the U.S.S.R.. 

These annotated notes for American history are not intended to antagonize loyal U.S. Constitutional patriotic citizens, and yet these notes are only to alert them of the inevitable on the horizon of U.S. History.  The ascension protocol demands a new 1776 U.S. Constitutional Republic must rise up.     

FINAL SETTLEMENT: 

Separation of States for a new 1776 U.S. Constitutional Republic is not a clever or ingenious manner of thought, but it is an imperative assessment of how to salvage the 1776 U.S. Constitution without carrying over fragments of the DC Uni-Party [democrats/republicans].  Of course as always there are naysayers who are currently benefiting great financial wealth within the current deep state corrupt government ready to cast their unwarranted useless input of doubt on the matter of Separation of States; as such is to be expected.  Yet handling the fidelity of creating new stabilized satellites/states will be a tall order to fill, but it must be accomplished whether you like it or not.   America today has far too many self inflicted problems caused by an unhinged corrupt and compromised government, infested with political parasites [congressional members] bent on unlimited power who garner saturated wealth [IRS] as they leech on Taxpaying American Citizens' earnings.  

1776 U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL DESCENDANTS:

For every problem on this earth there exists and have always been a solution, if the solution is seriously sought after....  We live in the United States of America under the United States Constitution; as such is embedded with Constitutional laws specifically designed and designated to give full power and  authority to every 1776 U.S. Constitutional Descendant; blessing them with the 2nd Amendment.  

With that said, we do not live in an unarmed Chinese society; nor are we a "copy cat Russian Revolution society" crawling upon the horizon.  Taxpaying American Citizens of the United States of America are born with the ability to fully arm and defend themselves against government intrusion.  After 2008 there arose without a doubt a future occasion of government intrusion upon Taxpaying American Citizens as becoming inevitable.  Unlike unarmed Chinese citizens and 1905 Russian citizens; 1776 U.S. Constitutional Descendants have been endowed by elder framers of the U.S. Constitution to defend their right to live in freedom and liberty. 

CONFRONTATIONAL RESOLUTION:

Two resolutions will come about to create a new chapter in American History, or start the first chapter in the new 1776 Constitutional Union of States.  There must be an orderly civilized "SEPARATION OF STATES," or the 2nd Amendment will be fully enforced by 1776 U.S. Constitutional Descendants  to defend against any government intrusion [encroachment] "Sturmabteilung (SA)" [assault division/paramilitary units]. 

Consider this truth; one of the main reasons foreign enemies of the U.S. have procrastinated to invade America with a military land invasion is because 1776 U.S. Constitutional Descendants [mainly Conservatives/Christians/U.S. Combat Veterans and a few Independents] are totally armed to defend their personage and property.   Therefore, if any hostile tyrannical government implementation erupts, there will be a sudden outcome.  This is not "Ukraine" [unarmed citizens] and there are more armed TAXPAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS than there are "tyrannical paramilitary units," or "sleeper cell muslims" on order to confront real Taxpaying American Citizens.   

CONTEXT OF POLITICAL CONSTRUCT:

The "LAW" of compound probability is naturally enforced by the "LAW" of diminishing return.  Existing today the "laws of compound probability and laws of diminishing return" is on full display by inexplicable abstract principles of U.S. congressional members managing TAXPAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS' money.  U.S. Congressional members are fully effectuating "TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION" by incontestable power gained through “no-term-limit” governance; as such demands upon them "REPRESENTATIVE PURGE."  

No discussion is needed to implement "REPRESENTATIVE PURGE" upon politicians that defy the U.S. Constitution. No discussion is needed to implement REPRESENTATIVE PURGE upon unaccountable politicians yielding an inexhaustible supply of raw tyrannical/dictatorial political power.  The current generation of young adolescent voting adults don't have the slightest intelligence to comprehend what political dragooning imply to their daily life.  Over and beyond half of U.S. inhabitants cannot interpret or decipher what “TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION” is.  Collectively the overall populous in America do not grasp how "TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION" is perfidiously placed upon them ….

ADAPTATION OF REPRESENTATIVE PURGE: 

If America has the slightest possibility of salvaging its "current" government management [executive branch, legislative branch, judicial branch] the motion of "REPRESENTATIVE PURGE" must be forwarded.  The D.C. "Uni-Party" [democrats/republicans] which rules and manages America's total operation are subjected to "filthy rich global elites" commands of political directives.  The 2024 election will not be the determining factor for salvaging the U.S. Constitution; only REPRESENTATIVE PURGE…..

Exterminate

Terminate

Assassinate

Eliminate 

There are no further steps to save "current" America; all due to America has become completely contaminated and poisoned by TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION, which is better known as "Naked Political Corruption."  

https://acbnewspaper.blogspot.com/2015/09/segregation-is-not-bad-word.html  

ORDERLY COMMON SENSE/ORDERLY SEPARATION:

Any possible salvage of the U.S. Constitution must be implemented through "SEPARATION OF STATES."  Yes, it would be nice if President Trump could become America's leader again.  Yet again and unfortunately, after President Trump's final oval office appearance "there again" will be another onslaught of demonic and wicked democrat party operatives functioning by directives of the global elite authoritarians. 

CONTROLLING THE ADOLESCENT VOTING ADULT:

The demonic tyrannical democrat party has mastered the ability [through big tech] to undermine current and future generations of young adolescent voting adults.  This has been possible through liberal network and social media-training.  Such training prepares the young adolescent voting adult's  credulous cerebral fixation upon a national social construct of living in a mirage to enhance their material psychology.  

Concurrently in correlation with liberal network media training young adolescent voting adults are not capable of grasping or appreciating America's historical morals and values [Christian foundation].  Sadly young adolescent adults in America can't apprehend the immediate context of Capitalism nor the larger context of Capitalism.  The masterplan of the democrat party has been to offer America's young adolescent voting adults "full liberty in any fashion of lifestyle" they desire.  

PERFECT DECEPTION TO CONTROL:

With legislation crafted by politicians to normalize demonic and wicked behavior of young adolescent voting adults simply correlates the intent of politicians themselves, to use their own wicked liberty as a "cloak of maliciousness.  In essence democrat party politicians have developed the perfect deception to garner young adolescent voting adults into voting for them.  The overall problem of garnering and capturing gullible young adolescent voting adults can't be corrected, it's a permanent factor.  The social construct damage of future voters of America have been crafted and completed.  Young adolescent voting adults are now groomed, enticed and lured into the free-for-all liberty entitlements, purposely  crafted by the democrat party to control their mind, lifestyle and money. 

 

Unless there's SEPARATION OF STATES [rebirthed states/new satellites] the cycle of inexhaustible malignant corruption in government and society will continue in the 2008-2032 deep state U.S. government. 

 America was formed in rebellion to TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.

The same formula to establish the original 1776 government will be needed to develop a new U.S. Constitutional Republic.  The new formation of independent satellites is the only way for the U.S. Constitution to be salvaged from the current iron fist of TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION crafted, developed and implemented by the Uni-Party [democrat/republican], liberalism and anti-Christian detractors.  

Dr BearClayborn -Political Psychiatrist-Editor in Chief-ACB Newspaper Intl 

REPUBLIC or DEMOCRACY; What is America?

What is the difference between a REPUBLIC and  DEMOCRACY?

America needs to know!

In this modern American society the liability of truth is no longer a premise for judging social development or social justice.  Why not, you may ask?   Well, there are conditions that motivate culture priority to accept the standards of social development towards a republic or democracy entity.  What this means is the dominating culture dictates the social protocol.   But, the United States of America is somewhat special in coagulating cultures without setting up a dominate culture.  In so, America was not founded on hopes of social or culture superiority development.  If studied properly you will uncover how the U.S. Constitution has already designed the proper coagulated living concept for citizens.  The United States of America was founded on the principles of GOD [the True and Living God of the Holy Bible].  So you see, it’s like this; the more distance America places itself from the principles of GOD the liability of truth is no longer a premise or threat for judging the United States of America. 

In return, as the United States of America distance itself from GOD’s principles [enactment of 2008-2016 administration] the manifesting results illuminate a society activated by high level immorality, loss of national identity and a judicial system bent on constitutional anarchy.  Therefore the ability for America’s current generation to comprehend itself as either a republic or a democracy is lost, along with its constitutional laws.

Once you’ve understood the foundational principals that America was established upon, then and only then can you understand the difference between a REPUBLIC and a DEMOCRACY!    

The United States of America is a mixture of the two systems of government (Republic under Common Law, and democracy under statutory law).  Please understand this basic principle; Citizens will enjoy their God-given natural rights in a Republic.  On the other side of the coin, in a democracy the Citizens enjoy only government granted privileges (also known as civil rights).

Whenever a generation of youth can’t identify with its country’s foundation or history, that country is put on notice to be forgotten in due time and history.  As such older Americans have forgotten their pledge of allegiance to America, and their children will never know what a pledge of allegiance is:

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,

and to the Republic for which it stands,

one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

In the Pledge of Allegiance we all pledge allegiance to our Republic, not to a democracy.  “Republic" is the proper description of our government, not "democracy."  There must be a social and public awareness regarding that distinction.

A republic and a democracy are identical in every aspect except one.  In a republic the sovereignty is in each individual person.   In a democracy the sovereignty is in the group.

FORWARD SUMMARY

Republic:  That form of government in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. [NOTE:  The word "people" may be either plural or singular.  In a republic the group only has advisory powers; the sovereign individual is free to reject the majority group-think.  USA/exception:  if 100% of a jury convicts, then the individual loses sovereignty and is subject to group-think as in a democracy.]

Democracy:   That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. [NOTE:  In a pure democracy, 51% beats 49%. In other words, the minority has no rights.  The minority only has those privileges granted by the dictatorship of the majority.]

The distinction between our Republic and a democracy is not an idle one.  It has great legal significance.  The Constitution guarantees to every state a Republican form of government (Art. 4, Sec. 4).   No state may join the United States unless it is a Republic.  Our Republic is one dedicated to "liberty and justice for all."  Minority individual rights are the priority. The people have natural rights instead of civil rights.  The people are protected by the Bill of Rights from the majority.  One vote in a jury can stop all of the majority from depriving any one of the people of his rights; this would not be so if the United States were a democracy.   

In a pure democracy, 51 beats 49[%].   In a democracy there is no such thing as a significant minority: there are no minority rights except civil rights (privileges) granted by a condescending majority.  Only five of the U.S. Constitution's first ten amendments apply to Citizens of the United States.  Simply stated, a democracy is a dictatorship of the majority.  Socrates was executed by a democracy:  though he harmed no one, the majority found him intolerable.

DEFINITIONS

Government:  The government is but an agency of the state, distinguished as it must be in accurate thought from its scheme and machinery of government. ....In a colloquial sense, the United States or its representatives, considered as the prosecutor in a criminal action; as in the phrase, "the government objects to the witness."   [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 625]

Government:  Republican government.  One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whome those powers are specially delegated.  In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.  [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626]

Democracy:   That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, pp. 388-389.

Note: Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, can be found in any law library and most law offices.

EXAMPLE

DEMOCRACY form of government:  An environmental organization proposes a bill for the ballot that every individual should reduce his water household usage by 25%. To assure that this goal is met, the government, or private sector, will monitor every individual's household water consumption rate.  If an individual does not meet the goal, his first offense is $500 fine.  Second offense is $750 fine and 30 days community service.  Third offense is $1,500 fine and 30 days imprisonment.  Fourth offense is $1,750 fine and 90 days imprisonment.  Fifth offense is a felony (1-year imprisonment) and $2,000 fine.

The people argue this environmental issue back and forth.  They argue the pros and cons of the issue.  This great debate is held at town hall meetings.  Strong opinions are on both sides of the matter.  One side preaches, "It is for the common good!" The other side rebuttals, "This is control and not freedom, and loss of choice!" Election day occurs; the people go to the ballot box to settle the problem.  The majority won by a vote of 51% whereas the minority lost with a vote of 49%.  The minority is ignored.  The majority celebrates while the minority jeers in disappointment.  Since the majority won, the bill goes in effect.  As a result of the majority winning, every individual must reduce his household water usage by 25%. For the reason that the majority has mandatory powers in a democracy.  Those who wish to go against the collective (whole body politic) will be punished accordingly. The minority has neither voice nor rights to refuse to accept the dictatorial majority. Everything is mandatory in a democracy.

REPUBLIC form of government:  An environmental organization proposes a bill for the ballot that every individual should reduce his water household usage by 25%. To assure that this goal is met, the government, or private sector, will monitor every individual's household water consumption rate.  If an individual does not meet the goal, his first offense is $500 fine.  Second offense is $750 fine and 30 days community service.  Third offense is $1,500 fine and 30 days imprisonment.  Fourth offense is $1,750 fine and 90 days imprisonment.  Fifth offense is a felony (1-year imprisonment) and $2,000 fine.

The people argue this environmental issue back and forth.  They argue the pros and cons of the issue.  This great debate is held at town hall meetings.  Strong opinions are on both sides of the matter.  One side preaches, "It is for the common good!" The other side rebuttals, "This is control and not freedom, and loss of choice!" Election day occurs; the people go to the ballot box to settle the problem.  The majority won by a vote of 51% whereas the minority lost with a vote of 49%. The minority may have lost, but not all is gone.  The majority celebrates while the minority jeers in disappointment.  Since the majority won, the bill goes in effect.  As a result of the majority winning, it is advisory that every individual reduce his household water usage by 25%.  For the reason that the majority has advisory powers in a republic; bear in mind that each individual is equally sovereign in a republic, he is free to reject the majority.  He may choose to follow the majority and subject himself to the rule, or he may choose not to follow the majority and not subject himself to the rule.  The minority has a voice and rights to refuse to accept the majority. Everything is advisory in a republic. This brings liberty and peace to the realm.

COMMENTS

Notice that in a Democracy, the sovereignty is in the whole body of the free citizens. The sovereignty is not divided to smaller units such as individual citizens.  To solve a problem, only the whole body politic is authorized to act.  Also, being citizens, individuals have duties and obligations to the government.  The government's only obligations to the citizens are those legislatively pre-defined for it by the whole body politic.

In a Republic, the sovereignty resides in the people themselves, whether one or many.  In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives as he chooses to solve a problem.  Further, the people have no obligation to the government; instead, the government being hired by the people is obliged to its owner, the people.

The people own the government agencies.  The government agencies own the citizens.  In the United States we have a three-tiered cast system consisting of people ---> government agencies ---> and citizens.

The people did "ordain and establish this Constitution," not for themselves, but "for the United States of America."  In delegating powers to the government agencies the people gave up none of their own.  (See Preamble of U.S. Constitution)  This adoption of this concept is why the U.S. has been called the "Great Experiment in self government."  The People govern themselves, while their agents (government agencies) perform tasks listed in the Preamble for the benefit of the People.  The experiment is to answer the question, "Can self-governing people coexist and prevail over government agencies that have no authority over the People?"

The citizens of the United States are totally subject to the laws of the United States (See 14th Amendment of U.S. Constitution).   NOTE: U.S. citizenship did not exist until July 28, 1868.

Actually, the United States is a mixture of the two systems of government (Republican under Common Law, and democratic under statutory law).  The People enjoy their God-given natural rights in the Republic.  In a democracy, the Citizens enjoy only government granted privileges (also known as civil rights).

There was a great political division between two major philosophers, Hobbes and Locke.  Hobbes was on the side of government.  He believed that sovereignty was vested in the state.  Locke was on the side of the People.  He believed that the fountain of sovereignty was the People of the state.  Statists prefer Hobbes.  Populists choose Locke.  Today in the United States of America over half of the states have taken the choice of representation from the people and given to partisan politicians.   But the Government Code sides with Locke; stating "The people do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them." The preamble of the U.S. Constitution affirm the choice of Locke by the People.

The question for the United States of America today is; will the United States of America remain a Republic and continue to value individual freedom, or become a collection of culture groups ruled by a dictator posing as a promoter of freedom via government rule?

Thomas Jefferson said that liberty and ignorance cannot coexist.  Will there be a continuation of the “Pledge of Allegiance” to support the 1776 established Republic [United States of America]?  Will there be a renewing of public knowledge to understand and comprehend the difference between a Republic and a democracy?

WORD of TRUTH

“If a NATION [AMERICA] expects to be IGNORANT and FREE in a STATE of civilization; then that NATION must EXPECT what NEVER WAS and NEVER WILL BE”    Thomas Jefferson, 1816.

These notes are courtesy of LAW NOTES